PatSeer-Fi-Logo-Large.png
Share:
Patent Search

Trolls are commonly known in cartoons and video games for their hostility towards humans. Patent trolls” refer to patent assertion entities that strategically exploit patent rights, affecting the progress of companies they target. They are non-practicing entities (NPEs) that acquire patents and then legally enforce them against large companies, with the sole goal of making profits. They are usually not counter-sued by the target companies since they are not making any commercial use of the acquired patents themselves. Unlike typical patent holders, trolls do not use their patents to create products or ideas; rather, they generate revenue solely through their enforcement actions. Patent trolls should not be confused to be the same as NPEs and they are just one type of NPE. Other types of NPEs are research institutes and universities, who conduct their own research (unlike patent trolls) and then focus on licensing or selling the patents developed out of that research. 

Trolls, however, must not be taken to be completely negative entities. Experts believe that despite their negative aspects, they also have a positive role. For instance, they help establish a secondary market for inventors to profit from their patents and give inventors opportunities to make money. They also expose our patent system’s biggest vulnerabilities. Despite attempts to paint them as a total hazard, research from Stanford suggests that patent trolls play a role in making the market function and ensuring inventors receive fair compensation. 

Let us look at the various techniques employed by patent trolls, before examining some of the positive and negative impacts of trolls in greater detail. 

Patent Trolling – Key tactics employed

A Google Search for news on patent trolls reveals trolls targeting everyone from small businesses to tech giants. Here is a brief overview of the technique employed by these firms:

  • Trolls focus on acquiring a patent from the existing owner without any intent of putting the patent to work within a product or service. This technique restricts a patent from being utilized for the greater good of society. 
  • Some patent trolls chase baseless infringement claims only with the intent of suppressing the competition. They use the threat of infringement via scare tactics such as a cease-and-desist letter even when they are not sure if the infringement is certain.  
  • To maximize profits, many patent trolls buy patents at deeply discounted prices by focusing on patents that are about to expire in the next 1-2 years or buying them from a bankrupt company. 
  • Certain patent trolls try to hide behind a network of shell companies making it difficult to identify the ultimate beneficiary of gains that they make and making it expensive for companies to go after them.

To understand if patent trolls are a boon or bane, let us examine their positive and negative impacts.  

The Positive Impact of Patent Trolls

According to research, many inventors’ resort to selling to Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), a term used by USPTO to refer to patent trolls, because their own advances to companies have been largely ignored and they lack the resources to legally pursue big corporations that may be leveraging the invention contained in the patent. The excessive costs of litigation can even drive such individuals to bankruptcy. In such cases, patent trolls can be the only option for such inventors to make some money from the patent. 

So, despite how they may be perceived as a negative persona, trolls are open to more than one linear interpretation. Moreover, some experts have pointed out that the absence of trolls would only limit inventors in an innovation-driven environment. 

Further, according to the Wall Street Journal, trolls help create a secondary market for patents that encourages innovation by compensating the small inventor. In a study by SK Shrestha, the author argues that many NPEs own valuable patents, contrary to popular opinion. This, in turn, allows them to incentivize some of the best innovations and fuel competition to produce technology better than ever made before.

The Negative Impact of Patent Trolls

According to a report, patent troll lawsuits grew 500% over the last decade. Patent trolls can impact the progress of innovation at the target companies by often enforcing vague, low-quality patents through shell companies. This leads to unforeseen costs for the companies who now must deploy time, money, and resources to defend themselves as opposed to focusing on spending the same on R&D or activities that can bring products faster to the market. Moreover, since trolls do not themselves produce a technology or product, but rather just assert the rights over others, they are immune to claims of counter-patent infringement. They typically send “letters” to hundreds or thousands of alleged infringers, demanding a variable sum. 

Not only do the products in question suffer delayed production and become more expensive for the consumer, but the cost of litigation can push the smaller companies to the brink of bankruptcy. Since litigation is expensive, smaller firms often go out of court settlements and fall victim to infringing patents they, in fact, never violated.  

Furthermore, it is important to note that patent trolls do not only target companies, but they may also go after end-users of products. One notable example is Innovation IP Ventures, a patent troll that demanded fees from establishments such as hotels and restaurants for using Wi-fi routers. Although this may seem unimaginable, it is an illustration of how patent trolls exploit various sectors of the industry. 

This reinforces our demands for stricter laws to curb hurtful trolling behavior that promotes healthy innovation and less room for unsolicited and potentially invalid legal threats.  

Conclusion

The concept of a patent troll is more complex than it seems, and trolls do not represent just the underbelly of the IP ecosystem. Calling NPEs that assert valuable patents, trolls (and many do, as research has shown) may not fit the description. That said, the overall impact that trolls create in the patent landscape cannot be overlooked. Stricter legislations that also do not stifle innovation are the need of the hour. The Leahy–Smith America Invents Act of 2011 has a clause to protect against low-quality patents. Some US states are also working on solutions to curb hollow demand letters. Hopefully, these will curtail the past abusive practices of trolls and level the playing field for all. 

PatSeer is transforming patent research with its AI-driven platform. The platform offers faster and more accurate patent search capabilities, simplifying data discovery for businesses and researchers. PatSeer, also delivers current global patent data, interactive trend analysis, dynamic technology clusters, and R&D investment insights to identify potential IP licensing partners. It accelerates infringement investigations with text-mining tools on global patent data and integrated ownership info. It streamlines collateral generation like citation maps, claim trees, and translated PDFs for enhanced productivity.

Simplify Your Research with PatSeer's AI. Discover More, Faster!

Similar Blogs

Scroll to Top
PatSeer
Play Video